Live site data
Rent Dedicated Server, Colocation and Cloud services | 23M
Dedicated Server, colocation and cloud solutions for business customers. ✓ High-Performant ✓ Scalable ✓ 24/7/365 Support
Last refresh
Updated 42d ago
Analyst read
In review
Detected stack
Quick read
23media.de looks like an uncategorized property. Traffic estimates are limited, so use the trust and structure modules first. Current AI trust scoring is 60/100.
What to do next
26/74 fields populated (35%)
Providers with missing fields
Provider health alerts
visual: 4/4
All expected fields present
Why this module matters
This section shows what the site appears to run on, which providers support it, and whether the technical footprint looks modern, stable, and discoverable.
"google-site-verification=Ur6LW5yq2wRQm0yTYKFfcRkgO6odAGFF57hDOjnsQpQ"
"google-site-verification=Ee1JSm9B_VxsogRrFd0-rpcb1HrkjvOHfki3BtDaB1o"
"v=spf1 a mx ip4:212.83.32.0/24 ip4:195.82.61.210/32 include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.nl2go.com ?all"
"v=DMARC1;p=reject;rua=mailto:postmaster@23media.com;ruf=mailto:postmaster@23media.com;adkim=r;aspf=r;rf=afrf"
Sitemap URLs
traffic.provider
TRAFFIC_NO_DATA
whois.provider
visual.provider
meta.provider
seo.provider
dns.provider
ads.provider
publisher.provider
0ms
Browser
1440ms
Fetch
0ms
AI
1502ms
Total
Keep exploring
Browse the related category, topic, or technology path, open alternatives, or move into comparison when you have a second domain.
Related technology
Browse Vuejs websites
Pivot from one domain into a stack-based discovery path.
Technology pages help you compare implementation patterns across similar sites.
Related technology
Browse Cloudflare websites
Pivot from one domain into a stack-based discovery path.
Technology pages help you compare implementation patterns across similar sites.
Alternatives
Open 23media.de alternatives
Review similar domains ranked by category, audience, technology overlap, and match reasons.
Use alternatives when this report is the start of a shortlist.
Comparison
Compare similar domains
Choose an alternative and move into a side-by-side comparison from the alternatives path.
meta: 3/3
All expected fields present
seo: 5/5
All expected fields present
dns: 4/4
All expected fields present
ads: 3/5
Missing: advertiserIds, advertiserNames
publisher: 4/5
Missing: adSystems
files: 3/3
All expected fields present
authority: 0/5
Missing: domainRating, source, licenseUrl, attribution, fetchedAt
history: 0/7
Missing: status, archiveVerdict, archiveScore, riskFlags, capturesCount, yearHistogram, titles
traffic: 0/16
Missing: monthlyVisits, globalRank, countryRank, bounceRate, avgVisitDuration, pagesPerVisit, dataYear, dataMonth, isStale, dataAgeDays, snapshotDate, cachedAt, topCountry, topRegions, topKeywords, trafficSources
whois: 0/6
Missing: whois.registrar, whois.createdAt, whois.expiresAt, whois.nameservers, whois.status, domainAgeYears
radar: 0/4
Missing: globalRank, rankBucket, categories, sourceTimestamp
ai: 0/7
Missing: taxonomy.iabCategory, taxonomy.iabSubCategory, taxonomy.confidence, taxonomy.tags, aiAnalysis.business, aiAnalysis.risk, aiAnalysis.visualAnalysis
Use compare pages once you have two candidate domains.
files.provider
authority.provider
AHREFS_DR_FETCH_FAILED
history.provider
ARCHIVE_HISTORY_RATE_LIMITED