Live site data
株式会社アマナ (amana inc.) | ビジュアルコミュニケーションによる企業価値の可視化と統合支援
株式会社アマナは、コミュニケーションデザイン事業を展開する企業です。45年の実績を持ち、「戦略・表現・技術」を軸に、企業の抱える課題を解決するビジュアルソリューションをワンストップで提供します。企業や社会の本質的な課題や価値を見出し、ビジュアライズすることで、「届けたい想いが伝わり、行動を促す」コミュニケーションを創出します。
Last refresh
Updated 1d ago
Analyst read
In review
Detected stack
Quick read
amana.jp looks like an uncategorized property. Traffic estimates are limited, so use the trust and structure modules first. Current AI trust scoring is 60/100.
What to do next
26/74 fields populated (35%)
Providers with missing fields
Provider health alerts
visual: 4/4
All expected fields present
Why this module matters
This section shows what the site appears to run on, which providers support it, and whether the technical footprint looks modern, stable, and discoverable.
"00d2v0000027czweam"
"3l0lvnd5rkq14k2cp8gckny14sggm0l8"
"MS=ms52698568"
"ZOOM_verify_TvYMQVLXXaHmfOU5aEq0Na"
"adobe-idp-site-verification=d97f636178c0c361e8e5b24c97efeaa6a20e67ee63136f1032213f7d1a83b77c"
"amazonses:3nGvFROMCBJe54YNarZ7+CCZzoDkGEUEYSH8Z0nYcsY="
"apple-domain-verification=KUxBlomgmrz8uRrM"
"google-site-verification=MDfIyHx97cIqZTPyA50OD4KmMEBJgRerSayo184ND1s"
"miro-verification=a8affdef7992780dca0a216785caf53a94c91b3b"
"openai-domain-verification=dv-wfIHzg64Rz7bjsfVPSjV891O"
"parsec-domain-verification=td_2xcw20cmU6KASG8XmjKhuNgLKaE"
"v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.amana.smtps.jp include:amazonses.com include:mktomail.com ~all"
Sitemap URLs
traffic.provider
TRAFFIC_NO_DATA
whois.provider
visual.provider
meta.provider
seo.provider
dns.provider
ads.provider
publisher.provider
0ms
Browser
536ms
Fetch
0ms
AI
598ms
Total
Keep exploring
Browse the related category, topic, or technology path, open alternatives, or move into comparison when you have a second domain.
Related technology
Browse Nextjs websites
Pivot from one domain into a stack-based discovery path.
Technology pages help you compare implementation patterns across similar sites.
Alternatives
Open amana.jp alternatives
Review similar domains ranked by category, audience, technology overlap, and match reasons.
Use alternatives when this report is the start of a shortlist.
Comparison
Compare similar domains
Choose an alternative and move into a side-by-side comparison from the alternatives path.
Use compare pages once you have two candidate domains.
meta: 3/3
All expected fields present
seo: 5/5
All expected fields present
dns: 4/4
All expected fields present
ads: 3/5
Missing: advertiserIds, advertiserNames
publisher: 4/5
Missing: adSystems
files: 3/3
All expected fields present
authority: 0/5
Missing: domainRating, source, licenseUrl, attribution, fetchedAt
history: 0/7
Missing: status, archiveVerdict, archiveScore, riskFlags, capturesCount, yearHistogram, titles
traffic: 0/16
Missing: monthlyVisits, globalRank, countryRank, bounceRate, avgVisitDuration, pagesPerVisit, dataYear, dataMonth, isStale, dataAgeDays, snapshotDate, cachedAt, topCountry, topRegions, topKeywords, trafficSources
whois: 0/6
Missing: whois.registrar, whois.createdAt, whois.expiresAt, whois.nameservers, whois.status, domainAgeYears
radar: 0/4
Missing: globalRank, rankBucket, categories, sourceTimestamp
ai: 0/7
Missing: taxonomy.iabCategory, taxonomy.iabSubCategory, taxonomy.confidence, taxonomy.tags, aiAnalysis.business, aiAnalysis.risk, aiAnalysis.visualAnalysis
"v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-reports@amana.jp"
files.provider
authority.provider
AHREFS_DR_FETCH_FAILED
history.provider
ARCHIVE_HISTORY_RATE_LIMITED