Live site data

antry.co.jp

Google

Last refresh

Updated 22d ago

Analyst read

In review

50/100 trustStale snapshot

Detected stack

Unknown

Quick read

How to read antry.co.jp quickly

antry.co.jp looks like an uncategorized property. Traffic estimates are limited, so use the trust and structure modules first. Current AI trust scoring is 50/100.

What to do next

The stack appears to include Unknown.
Open the Traffic tab if you need audience scale and geography before outreach.
Open the Business tab if trust, monetization, or positioning is your first decision filter.

Provider Completeness

25/74 fields populated (34%)

4 health alerts13 providers

Providers with missing fields

meta: 2/3ads: 3/5publisher: 4/5authority: 0/5history: 0/7traffic: 0/16whois: 0/6radar: 0/4ai: 0/7

Provider health alerts

authority: AHREFS_DR_FETCH_FAILEDhistory: ARCHIVE_HISTORY_RATE_LIMITEDtraffic: TRAFFIC_NO_DATAwhois: WHOIS_LOOKUP_FAILED

View field-level status

visual: 4/4

All expected fields present

meta: 2/3

Missing: description

seo: 5/5

All expected fields present

dns: 4/4

All expected fields present

ads: 3/5

Missing: advertiserIds, advertiserNames

publisher: 4/5

Missing: adSystems

files: 3/3

All expected fields present

authority: 0/5

Missing: domainRating, source, licenseUrl, attribution, fetchedAt

history: 0/7

Missing: status, archiveVerdict, archiveScore, riskFlags, capturesCount, yearHistogram, titles

traffic: 0/16

Missing: monthlyVisits, globalRank, countryRank, bounceRate, avgVisitDuration, pagesPerVisit, dataYear, dataMonth, isStale, dataAgeDays, snapshotDate, cachedAt, topCountry, topRegions, topKeywords, trafficSources

whois: 0/6

Missing: whois.registrar, whois.createdAt, whois.expiresAt, whois.nameservers, whois.status, domainAgeYears

radar: 0/4

Missing: globalRank, rankBucket, categories, sourceTimestamp

ai: 0/7

Missing: taxonomy.iabCategory, taxonomy.iabSubCategory, taxonomy.confidence, taxonomy.tags, aiAnalysis.business, aiAnalysis.risk, aiAnalysis.visualAnalysis

Why this module matters

Use the SEO tab as a quality and discoverability check

These metrics help you decide whether a site is structured clearly enough for search and users. Strong heading, linking, and technical file patterns usually indicate better discoverability.

Check heading counts to spot thin or messy structure.
Review robots and sitemap presence before treating a site as search-mature.
Use taxonomy and AI notes to understand topical fit.

Heading Structure

H1 Tags0

H2 Tags0

Images1

Link Analysis

Internal Links6

External Links4

Link Ratio60% internal

Technical Files Checklist

robots.txt

File found and accessible

sitemap.xml

Sitemap found and valid

Single H1 Tag

Found 0 H1 tags

Meta Description

Missing meta description

Sitemap URLs

https://antry.co.jp/sitemap.xml

Keep exploring

Keep exploring from this report

Browse the related category, topic, or technology path, open alternatives, or move into comparison when you have a second domain.

Related technology

Browse Unknown websites

Pivot from one domain into a stack-based discovery path.

Technology pages help you compare implementation patterns across similar sites.

Alternatives

Open antry.co.jp alternatives

Review similar domains ranked by category, audience, technology overlap, and match reasons.

Use alternatives when this report is the start of a shortlist.

Comparison

Compare similar domains

Choose an alternative and move into a side-by-side comparison from the alternatives path.

Use compare pages once you have two candidate domains.

Next step: open alternatives, browse related paths, or refresh this report.