Quick read
autocad.ru looks like technology & computing. Traffic signals point to roughly 8.2K monthly visits. Current AI trust scoring is 59/100.
What to do next
47/62 fields populated (76%)
Providers with missing fields
visual: 4/4
All expected fields present
meta: 3/3
All expected fields present
seo: 5/5
All expected fields present
dns: 4/4
All expected fields present
ads: 3/5
Missing: advertiserIds, advertiserNames
publisher: 2/5
Missing: adSystems, directCount, resellerCount
files: 2/3
Missing: robotsSitemapUrls
traffic: 15/16
Missing: cachedAt
whois: 0/6
Missing: whois.registrar, whois.createdAt, whois.expiresAt, whois.nameservers, whois.status, domainAgeYears
radar: 2/4
Missing: categories, sourceTimestamp
ai: 7/7
All expected fields present
Why this module matters
These metrics help you decide whether a site is structured clearly enough for search and users. Strong heading, linking, and technical file patterns usually indicate better discoverability.
robots.txt
File found and accessible
sitemap.xml
Sitemap found and valid
Single H1 Tag
Found 0 H1 tags
Meta Description
Meta description present
Keep exploring
Browse the related category, topic, or technology path, open alternatives, or move into comparison when you have a second domain.
Related category
Browse Technology & Computing sites
Move from this site data report into the broader market cluster.
Use category pages when market context matters more than one domain.
Related topic
Browse Software sites
Use the topic route when audience and editorial intent matter more than category.
Topic pages help you compare audience intent around the same domain.
Related technology
Browse Unknown websites
Pivot from one domain into a stack-based discovery path.
Technology pages help you compare implementation patterns across similar sites.
Alternatives
Open autocad.ru alternatives
Review similar domains ranked by category, audience, technology overlap, and match reasons.
Use alternatives when this report is the start of a shortlist.
Comparison
Compare similar domains
Choose an alternative and move into a side-by-side comparison from the alternatives path.
Use compare pages once you have two candidate domains.
